This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] benefits of walled gardens [DNS-based filtering]
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrik Fältström
paf at frobbit.se
Sun Jan 26 18:17:53 CET 2014
On 26 jan 2014, at 17:27, Roland Perry <roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote: >> And I thought this paper was about domains more than domain registries? > > Yes, which is why the paper should positively avoid the inclusion of confusing examples such as domains operated by I* entities. My view is that a paper should include example domain names that are defined to be example domain names. See RFC2606 / RFC6761 (i.e. BCP32). I.e. I think the author of this document has done the right thing. Patrik -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20140126/61c78d77/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] benefits of walled gardens [DNS-based filtering]
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]