This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Sat Jan 25 16:54:35 CET 2014
Roland, you seem to be going off at a tangent. If you want to continue a discussion of what a "clueful" DNS user or robust DNS service means please take it to the DNS Working Group. Any definitions that emerge there can be fed into this WG. Assuming both WGs survive the heat death of the universe. :-) In the context of the document we're discussing here -- DNS blocking for government and regulatory people -- the point that should be made is that DNS service for some domain does not necessarily rest with a single entity. ie all the authoritative name servers for a domain might not be under the same administrative and operational control: SLAs, reporting and incident response procedures, legal jurisdictions, contracts, T&Cs, etc. Sent from a wee shiny thing with no keyboard that creates typos
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] DNS-based filtering
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]