[cooperation-wg] cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 22, Issue 10

Jim´s suggestions make a lot of sense. +1 from me.

Wout de Natris


> From: cooperation-wg-request at ripe.net
> Subject: cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 22, Issue 10
> To: cooperation-wg at ripe.net
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:00:03 +0200
> 
> Send cooperation-wg mailing list submissions to
> 	cooperation-wg at ripe.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/cooperation-wg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	cooperation-wg-request at ripe.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cooperation-wg-owner at ripe.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cooperation-wg digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Candidature Co-Chair for the RIPE Cooperation WG
>       (Alain Van Gaever)
>    2. Candidates (Gordon Lennox)
>    3. appointing a new co-chair (Jim Reid)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:16:39 +0100
> From: Alain Van Gaever <avangaev at gmail.com>
> Subject: [cooperation-wg] Candidature Co-Chair for the RIPE
> 	Cooperation WG
> To: cooperation-wg at ripe.net
> Message-ID:
> 	<CANeNdNK2bqDfSEU_YTRFJi5ueWgMv+FBy=8Vpij640jWs-V6Dg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> 
> During the conference in Athens a couple of week ago, I noticed that the
> RIPE community could use some help in their relations with the European
> Institutions and other governmental organisations.
> 
> 
> Given my background in both technology and legislation/policy I thought I
> could lend a hand.
> 
> 
> I worked 8 years in the European Commission and worked (among others) on
> the current European Telecoms legislation. Currently I work in the CTO
> office of Ofcom - the U.K. national telecom regulator.   If you want more
> background information on me, feel free to check out my LinkedIn profile:
> uk.linkedin.com/in/alainvangaever/
> 
> 
> Therefore ? if the RIPE community approves ? I would like to introduce my
> candidature for co-chairing the RIPE Cooperation working group.
> 
> 
> With kind regards,
> 
> 
> Alain Van Gaever
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20131025/40ad2893/attachment-0001.html 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:25:42 +0200
> From: Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com>
> Subject: [cooperation-wg] Candidates
> To: "cooperation-wg at ripe.net" <cooperation-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID: <E0C63299-A4AD-4467-9F82-F97DE903F095 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> 
> If I understand well we now have four (possible) candidates for co-chair:
> 
> Alain van Gaever
> Erika Hersaeus 
> Meredith Whittaker
> Niall O'Reilly
> 
> This is great! Four good people - yet with quite different backgrounds and skills. It really shows the interest if the WG. And there is a lot of important work to be done.
> 
> Just waiting for Warsaw does not seem that sensible though. Not on a people level and not on a work level. Among other things we in the EU will be beginning the transition to a new Parliament and a new Commission around then.
> 
> So what should be the plan?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Gordon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:49:53 +0100
> From: Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com>
> Subject: [cooperation-wg] appointing a new co-chair
> To: Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com>
> Cc: "cooperation-wg at ripe.net" <cooperation-wg at ripe.net>
> Message-ID: <9BA2F891-EE3F-47F2-BE5E-07D37090BCBE at rfc1035.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On 26 Oct 2013, at 10:25, Gordon Lennox <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Just waiting for Warsaw does not seem that sensible though.
> 
> +1. Let's get this done quickly and with the minimum of fuss.
> 
> > So what should be the plan?
> 
> IMO the current chair(s) should pick who they think is the best candidate, explain why and ask the WG to endorse that decision. [For this exercise we could assume Patrik hasn't resigned until his replacement is in place.] Keep the appointment process simple and lightweight.
> 
> FWIW my preference would be to have someone who has a regulatory/government background rather than a mostly Internet person. The former should have a wider set of contacts with the people and organisations we'd like to bring in to the WG as well as a better understanding of what goes on in government/regulatory circles.
> 
> Perhaps others here could say which characteristics they want (or don't want) from the new co-chair? That would help Maria (and Patrik?) choose the candidiate most likely to get widest endorsement form the WG. I'm sure whoever gets chosen would of course get that endorsement.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> End of cooperation-wg Digest, Vol 22, Issue 10
> **********************************************
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20131026/627b1b31/attachment.html>