This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] European Parliament
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin Boyle
Martin.Boyle at nominet.org.uk
Sun Oct 20 16:36:48 CEST 2013
Just to make sure that everyone is clear on the division of responsibilities: * ITRE has SOLE competence on: o Article 1 (3) - reference to the electronic communications Directive o Article 3.1(a) - as above o Article 7 - CERTS o Recitals 5, 11, 23 - which covered the above issues *ITRE has SHARED competence with IMCO on: o Article 1(2) (Subject matter and scope); o Article 3(1)(b-c); Article 3(2-4), (6-7), (11) (Definitions); o Article 8 (Cooperation network); o Article 9 (Secure information-sharing system); o Article 10 (Early warnings); o Article 11 (Coordinated response); o Article 12 (Union NIS cooperation plan); o Article 14 (Security requirements and incident notification); o Article 15 (Implementation and enforcement); o Article 18 (Exercise of the delegation); o Article 19 (Committee procedure); o Recitals 12-20, 22, 24-31, 34-36. In the case of shared competence, it is possible that IMCO and ITRE will coordinate and try to reach common opinions. If not, ITRE can re-table its amendments when the discussion goes into plenary. There are two other committees with competence: LIBE and SEDE. If I understand correctly, these are exclusive competence, so their input should be accepted directly by IMCO. However, some of this is disturbing (liability of software producers, for example). Best Martin -----Original Message----- From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Wim Degezelle Sent: 17 October 2013 23:34 To: 'Bastiaan Goslings'; 'Gordon Lennox' Cc: cooperation-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] European Parliament Hi All, The leading Committee in EP on the NIS Directive is IMCO (Internal Market) with Andreas Schwab as Rapporteur. Where there is a so-called 'shared competence' the ITRE Committee and LIBE Committee take the lead. Procedure file: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&refere nce=COM%282013%290048 Best, Wim CENTR > -----Original Message----- > From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:cooperation-wg- > bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Bastiaan Goslings > Sent: donderdag 17 oktober 2013 16:33 > To: Gordon Lennox > Cc: Bastiaan Goslings; cooperation-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] European Parliament > > On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Gordon Lennox > <gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The European Internet Foundation includes a group of MEPs who have a > clear interest in Internet matters. > > > > https://www.eifonline.org/members.html > > > > There are others of course! > > > Thanks, Gordon - btw do you know which EU parliamentarian 'committee' > was being referred to during the Coop session today in Athens? > Supposedly this would give one an indication which national MEP(s) to > approach re the proposed NIS Directive... > > Btw I have been talking to the Dutch representative in the Council's > working group (hope that is the correct English translation) and > learnt that from her perspective nothing has really changed or been > done since the initial position/reflection re the proposed Directive > went to the Dutch Parliament in in March... > > (a position btw that states similar concerns as the ones that RIPE NCC > mentioned) > > Bastiaan > AMS-IX > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] European Parliament
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]