[cooperation-wg] Internet governance

at the risk of derailing the thread, what *does* anticensorship taste like?
(stated more plainly: I don't follow.)


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Roland Perry <
roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote:

> In message <528E1E7B.60000 at inex.ie>, at 14:53:47 on Thu, 21 Nov 2013,
> Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> writes
>
>  Where is the "running code" when it come to (eg) denying IXPs the right to
>>> have provider-independent IPv6 addresses (as was the case for some
>>> considerable time).
>>>
>>
>> that particular policy bug was fixed in the summer of 2001.  In the 12.5
>> years since then, I think we can reasonably claim that the RIPE community
>> has built up a vibrant interest in actively managing its addressing
>> policies using bottom up principals.
>>
>
> And I don't dispute that for a moment.
>
> Currently I'm particularly interested in getting the "underbottom" (that's
> users and their representatives, rather than typically the layer above,
> their connectivity suppliers) more involved in that process. It's a bit
> like "civil society, but without the anticensorship flavour".
> --
> Roland Perry
>
>


-- 

Meredith Whittaker
Program Manager, Google Research
Google NYC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20131121/0bd33812/attachment.html>