This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon May 6 11:02:18 CEST 2013
On 6 May 2013, at 09:48, Andrea.GLORIOSO at ec.europa.eu wrote: > But a statement such as "the ITU is supposed to leave Internet Governance alone" is perhaps a bit exaggerated. Andrea, you're reading into what I said something I did not write. So from that perspective, yes, it is a bit exaggerated. I should have said ITU is supposed to keep away from an operational role in Internet governance: for instance by issuing IP addresses or making policy on domain names or defining requirements for key Internet infrastructure such as root and TLD name servers. To pick a few examples at random.... It takes a lot longer to type all of that. So my original remark was somewhat offhand and terse. Just like me...
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]