This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/cooperation-wg@ripe.net/
[cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon May 6 10:20:40 CEST 2013
On 6 May 2013, at 08:42, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote: > I encourage everyone to, for example, have a look at this document and others that describe one view of the Internet that for example does not match my personal view. Thanks for this Patrik. It's all very well to look at these documents and perhaps comment on them here. But what should people do if they want to have their views heard where it would have the most impact? Should they make a trip to Geneva? Is the WTPF meeting open to non members? If not, how do non-ITU members get someone (who?) to make representations on their behalf? Would the NCC do this? How? Will the NCC even be at WTPF? What are the likely consequences of this WTPF meeting? Can it decide anything which influences or determines ITU policy, eg create a resolution that becomes a binding agenda item for the next plenipot or requires the ITU to set up a new study group? So many questions... I wonder too why ITU is continuing to discuss Internet governance when that issue is supposed to be something they've to leave alone.
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] WTPF in Geneva
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]