[cooperation-wg] Proposed Workplan Coop-WG

Could I suggest something along the lines of Internet governance post Montevideo?  Or is that so obvious it is take as read?  I'd like people to think very carefully about what they'd see as good outcomes from the Brazil-hosted Multi-stakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance.

From: cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:cooperation-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Meredith Whittaker
Sent: 02 December 2013 15:22
To: Nick Hilliard
Cc: cooperationWG cooperationWG; Maria Häll
Subject: Re: [cooperation-wg] Proposed Workplan Coop-WG

Hi Nick,

Great call -- we were thinking to cover content filtering as a sub-section of "intermediary responsibility." We'll make this more explicit by listing it specifically, unless you (all) think it makes sense to give it its own section.

Cheers,
Meredith

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie<mailto:nick at inex.ie>> wrote:
On 30/11/2013 16:19, Maria Häll wrote:
> *Topics for engagement, and modes of engagement*____
>
> To make the best use of limited time and resources, we suggest focusing
> on a select number of technical topics that are currently important
> within a number of policy debates. Note that this suggestion is not
> meant as a limitation: the focus topics will shift, and change, and any
> RIPE community member eager to engage another topic is invited to do so.
> The Coop-WG mailing list will will, of course, remain open and welcoming
> of lively debate.
Could I suggest you add content filtering to this list?  I realise it can
take up a lot of discussion time, but it is rather important.

Nick




--

Meredith Whittaker
Program Manager, Google Research
Google NYC



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/cooperation-wg/attachments/20131202/68c7d4c0/attachment.html>