This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dmitry Burkov
dburk at burkov.aha.ru
Tue Aug 7 23:13:25 CEST 2012
it is useful - what I mentioned before was also raised in my short talk(not discussion) with Kramer and Verveer today and practically in the same wording as I mentioned before - the potential problems are a definition Internet as international telco services and as consequencies - CPP -CLI - OTT USG guys accents more on definition and CPP - but recognized importance last ones On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Jim Reid wrote: > > On 3 Aug 2012, at 16:56, Matthew Ford wrote: > >> This may be of interest: >> >> https://fileshare.tools.isoc.org/wentworth/public/WCIT%20issues%20matrix/WCIT-ISSUES-MATRIX-15June2012.pdf >> > > Thanks Mat. > >
- Previous message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
- Next message (by thread): [cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]