[cooperation-wg] an unwelcome ITR development?

contribution 40 from March 2011 is well known and it is a key base for all speculations

but nothing was done - even requested wording

But there are more even more dangerous contributions - I recommend to read full lists of them


On Aug 3, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Jim Reid wrote:

> http://wcitleaks.org is publishing contributions (ITU-speak for discussion papers, agenda items, etc) which are likely to be discussed at the ITR meeting in December.
> 
> According to http://files.wcitleaks.org/public/Russia%2040.pdf, Russia wants the ITU to effectively become an RIR and allocate IPv6 addresses. See item 8 at the bottom of page 3 of their list of changes to the ITR Articles. Looks like someone's been drinking the Nav6 Kool-Aid. Sigh.
> 
> Will the NCC as a Sector Member, (and the other RIRs?) submit a response to this? Should concerned members of this WG be contacting their governments?
> 
>