[connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
- Previous message (by thread): [connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
- Next message (by thread): [connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Fri Jun 7 14:38:55 CEST 2024
On Jun 06, "Barry O'Donovan (Open Solutions)" <barry at opensolutions.ie> wrote: > > This is correct, but in the end it does not matter in our view: the plan > > agreed by the IXP operators also contemplates educating their members to > > move (or at least replicate) the correct data to the authoritative IRRs. > I think you're referring to the Euro-IX Route Server Workshop held recently > in Rome? No, I am referring to private discussions that me and Stavros had over the past year with other IX operators. > Others have already noted that a BCOP should reflect established /current/ > operating practices, and I think this proposal fails that test. Yes, this is clear now. -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/connect-wg/attachments/20240607/3b28121b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
- Next message (by thread): [connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]