This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/connect-wg@ripe.net/
[connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
- Previous message (by thread): [connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
- Next message (by thread): [connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Fri Jun 7 14:38:55 CEST 2024
On Jun 06, "Barry O'Donovan (Open Solutions)" <barry at opensolutions.ie> wrote: > > This is correct, but in the end it does not matter in our view: the plan > > agreed by the IXP operators also contemplates educating their members to > > move (or at least replicate) the correct data to the authoritative IRRs. > I think you're referring to the Euro-IX Route Server Workshop held recently > in Rome? No, I am referring to private discussions that me and Stavros had over the past year with other IX operators. > Others have already noted that a BCOP should reflect established /current/ > operating practices, and I think this proposal fails that test. Yes, this is clear now. -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 228 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/connect-wg/attachments/20240607/3b28121b/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
- Next message (by thread): [connect-wg] BCOP for the use of IRR DBs in IXP RS - Last call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]