[connect-wg] virtual session at RIPE 80

Stavros Konstantaras via connect-wg <connect-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
    >> We consider maintaining our 1.5 hour slot for the moment, unless you
    >> propose otherwise. We'd also like to suggest as a main topic for the
    >> working group a discussion session around the impact of covid-19 on
    >> traffic, including but not restricted to the role of IXPs during the
    >> crisis.

    > Nice idea and indeed a hot topic of our times. I believe many of us not
    > only experienced new traffic peaks (that give nice topics for the
    > marketing people to publish) but also had to face difficult challenges

let me add:
* Experiences and policies with publishing traffic statistics from IXPs.
  How, when, where to anonymize while still getting that marketing push.

* stories about using this opportunity to fix/deploy things.
  (as long as nobody is *at* the FOOBAR office to complain...)

    > like:
    > - emergency upgrades on the internal network
    > - emergency customer upgrades (like up and running in 2-3 hours)
    > - equipment under stress/overload
    > - restricted access to datacenter

    > And I’m sure I forget some more, but I would be glad to hear more
    > stories from the fellow IXP colleagues.

Perhaps someone has some security/useability presentation on ILO/iDrac/IPMI
experiences.
I have never gotten IPMI serial consoles to work reliably for instance.
(Or: maybe there are hundreds of such talks out there, but I don't know where to
find them)

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/connect-wg/attachments/20200327/c44239c6/attachment.sig>