[coc-tf] Draft Minutes – CoC TF Seventeenth Call

Thanks Leo,

We'll amend the minutes and get an updated version sent next week (we 
will share the doc next week as well).

Cheers

Ant

On 04/11/2021 18:35, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Hi Antony,
> 
> Thanks for these draft minutes.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 12:13 PM Antony Gollan <agollan at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Summary: The TF discussed the relevance of the Python community’s CoC and what they could borrow from this. They discussed what might constitute a conflict of interest for a member of the CoC Team and agreed that it might be wise to have someone from the RIPE NCC’s Legal team available if an impartial voice was needed. The TF also decided that having a few investigators rather than a single individual might be the best approach for quick decision-making. The TF discussed the role of WG chairs in cases where violations took place on a mailing list. The TF concluded that input from the WG chairs could inform an investigation but the CoC Team itself must make the decision. The issue of acceptable evidence in a case was also brought up, and Athina advised that publicly available records were permissible as well as private records. Finally, the TF considered whether an escalating process of consequences would be useful and decided that it would be best to have a list of consequences that did not have to occur in sequence. Leo said he would draft a proposal for the CoC Team process that he would share with the rest of the TF for discussion.
> 
> The minutes documenting the call look good to me but I think this
> summary could be clarified to note that the action documented at the
> end is for me to create a draft and share it with you and Athina
> before the whole list. I have done this and also shared it with
> Denesh, as he will be chairing tomorrow when I'll be on a plane.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Leo
>