[coc-tf] Fwd: W3C Code of Conduct
- Previous message (by thread): [coc-tf] Fwd: W3C Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [coc-tf] Draft Minutes - Code of Conduct TF: First Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo at vegoda.org
Tue Oct 13 16:24:23 CEST 2020
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 1:14 AM Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet at heanet.ie> wrote: > > Oh, thanks Mirjam, I really like a lot of this, certainly the first half. There are some great examples of what not to do and I love the prioritisation of safety. So sections 1, 2 & 3 read really well to me. I agree. I particularly like that they define expected behavior. The need for this was brought up during the discussion of v3. I also like that they link to educational materials. I think we could do that and I expect we could find a better set of materials. > Section 4 is a bit weak, imo, but may provide some guidelines for us. Agreed. The gap in section 4 is that they don't explain how disputed events are investigated, decisions are made, or appeals are handled. Kind regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [coc-tf] Fwd: W3C Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [coc-tf] Draft Minutes - Code of Conduct TF: First Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ coc-tf Archives ]