[coc-tf] Followup on today's meeting
- Previous message (by thread): [coc-tf] Draft agenda for Friday's call
- Next message (by thread): [coc-tf] Followup on today's meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo at vegoda.org
Fri Dec 4 21:12:33 CET 2020
Dear CoC TF, It was lovely to see and speak with you all earlier today. We agreed that we would all review, comment, and edit Document 1 in the working draft by the end of Friday next week, and then discuss on the list if we were in a position to publish it as a draft. During our discussion, Brian noted that there was a difference in style between the Expected and Unacceptable Behaviours sections. The first made good use of bullets and the second had longer paragraphs that were harder to parse. I have now broken those paragraphs into bullets and listed the bullets alphabetically, which I hope makes it clear that these are not in order of importance. This is visually a large change, so I wanted to call it out. I'd also like to call your attention to some open comments on parts of the Rationale section. Do we want to make changes to the text, or perhaps refer to external resources? We also agreed to work on a draft communication. I have started work on a draft, which attempts to remind people when we last communicated and what we are doing. It then goes on to say what we have worked on and there are two options for where we are now. Either, the draft has been published and comments are welcome, or stating that the draft will be published in January. Working draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zkYiQPkX6tq09tdpQdL_URbvfnILgwrqRn2zq2eBRYc Draft communication: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uatZQ_qSLrxpS9v-fnq5sIYp5Pne2aYzwFowhl1XVBw/ Kind regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [coc-tf] Draft agenda for Friday's call
- Next message (by thread): [coc-tf] Followup on today's meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ coc-tf Archives ]