This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[bcop] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz - ISOC
zorz at isoc.org
Mon Apr 3 16:51:31 CEST 2017
On 03/04/2017 16:40, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, Nathalie Trenaman wrote: > >> the paragraph after “assigning a /64 or smaller prefix is highly >> discouraged” > > Hi, > > I also like this document. I would put a reference somewhere to: > > https://www.broadband-forum.org/technical/download/TR-177.pdf > > "A delegated prefix for use within the home network (mandatory). The > Broadband Forum suggests a size for the delegated prefix of at least a > /60 for home network or SOHO environments, with a recommended prefix > length of /56. The delegated prefix may be extended to a /48 for larger > organizations." > > Just to at least say that /64 is defective, and all documents I have > read from organizations that write about this, says at least /60, most > recommend /56. Piling on that BBF agrees probably wouldn't hurt. Excellent suggestion, added, thnx!!! Cheers from Cameroon, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] IPv6 prefix delegation BCOP document available for comments and suggestions
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]