[bcop] Community statement

Hi Sander,

On 30/05/16 15:48, Sander Steffann wrote:
>> Thanks for coordinating this and making this statement at the closing
>> plenary session.
> 
> Unfortunately the plenary didn't accept the statement as a community statement/resolution as-is. The good news is that the reason for that is that they wanted a stronger statement :) Ruediger Volk was the person stating that on the microphone during the plenary, and he offered to help improve the language. I talked to Hans Petter Holen about what to do next, and he suggested taking this to the ripe-list so we can get consensus there and still turn this into a community-wide supported statement, which I think is important.
> 
> I suggest Ruediger and I work on the text and then take it straight to the ripe-list. Doing word-smithing first in BCOP and then on the ripe-list will probably double the work, and as the BCOP task force already had consensus on the old version I'd like to take this directly to the superset :-)
> 
> Do you agree with this plan?

I was happy to hear that the plenary supported the idea, but asked for a
stronger wording of the statement.

The procedure you suggested makes sense to me.

Best,

- Benno

-- 
Benno J. Overeinder
NLnet Labs
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/bcop/attachments/20160530/b7280c61/attachment.sig>