This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Enno Rey
erey at ernw.de
Wed Oct 15 21:47:27 CEST 2014
Guys, thank you very much, Iljitsch, for starting this - as I think - long needed discussion. Given I have some background as for the reasoning and perspective of "those organizations wishing to deaggregate" I will happily join the discussion in London. Please allow to point interested parties to this blogpost on the topic: http://www.insinuator.net/2014/10/deaggregation-by-large-organizations/, and to the slides referenced therein which might serve as a contribution to the discussion beforehand. cheers Enno On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:42:43PM +0200, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > On 15/10/14 16:00, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > FYI, I just sent this to the IETF v6ops and grow lists: > > > > We are all familiar with PA (provider aggregatable) and PI (provider > > independent) address space. But it turns out a new type of IPv6 > > address space is starting to show up, which I'll call organization > > deaggregatable (OD) address space (until someone suggests a better > > name). > > Dear Iljitsch, > > My *personal* feeling is that RIRs (and NOGs) would be much more > suitable place for this discussion, as IETF in principle and > historically was not meant to deal with routing policy and/or routing > table handling. > > Being said that, if you can join us on Monday, 3rd November at 18:00 in > London for RIPE BCOP TF meeting, I think we can have appropriate > discussion about this topic and also ask operators in the room if they > would be interested to join and work cooperatively with you on this > document. > > Dear BCOP community - Benno and myself would really appreciate some > feedback on this topic before the meeting, so we can shape the message > and discussion properly. Goal of the BCOP TF is to get operators > together to document Best Current Operational Practice and I think this > could be very well one of most needed ones. > > Cheers and thnx, Jan Zorz > -- Enno Rey ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902 Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Enno Rey ======================================================= Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator =======================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] Deaggregation by large organizations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]