This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nathalie Trenaman
nathalie at ripe.net
Mon Nov 10 12:23:39 CET 2014
Hi William, On 09 Nov 2014, at 12:47, William Waites <wwaites at tardis.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > I've started writing here: > > https://pad.okfn.org/p/bcop-small-ipv6 > > Today, a couple of paragraphs about the intended audience before > getting into the meat of it. > > -w > Thanks, a good start. Just one comment: "they also need ipv4 addresses to use as router-id (need not be global, but need to be unique).” is not true. It needs to be a 32-bit number, but it doesn’t have to be an IPv4 address. This should be made clear, as I notice in our training courses, a lot of engineers seem to think that the router ID MUST be an IPv4 address, while it normally is, it is not mandatory. 0.0.0.1 is a valid router-ID, I believe. In an IPv6-only network, for example, when you have no IPv4 addresses, you can just make something 32-bitty up and use that as the router ID. On the address assignment: What we see and hear in practice in our courses, is assign something on 4-bit boundary, big enough to cater for the next 10 years. So: a /64 only if you are absolutely sure that the customer will never come back for one more subnet (not likely). a /60 (if you are conservative) a /56 (most common for residential users) a /52 (we see this in some cases for both residential customers and business customers) a /48 (for business customers, or for residential customers if you are generous, and have a one-size-fits-all-approach) I hope this helps, Cheers, Nathalie
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]