This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill Armstrong
wrarmstrong at gmail.com
Thu May 22 00:13:25 CEST 2014
Thanks for the info Benno! With that also being a fledgling initiative, there is probably no harm in NANOG moving toward that same goal...Now, merging the documents and determining which best practice is in-fact BEST may become interesting, but that is a problem for the future. Bill On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Benno Overeinder <benno at nlnetlabs.nl>wrote: > Hi, > > With the last RIPE68 meeting, a BGP configuration BCOP proposal was > presented by Francios Contat, see > https://ripe68.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/bcop-tf/. > > In the slides, Francios explained their approach: get ISPs on board, > definitions, scenarios, good practices, etc. The presentation was a call > for interest for others to join. Next is to redefine goals, scope, etc., > such that it will become a manageable document. Work to obtain input, > review, collect comments will take place in the RIPE Routing Working Group. > > The document already available is in French, but Google translate does a > good job to obtain an English version. > > Best, > > Benno Overeinder > > > Op 21 mei 2014 om 17:35 heeft Bill Armstrong <wrarmstrong at gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > Ahoy There! > Over the last few months the NANOG BCOP committee has combed through the > NANOG and various other NOG/IETF-Ops mailing lists and have identified a > stack reoccurring or pressing questions and concerns which we are using as > seeds for our initial BCOP Appeals. One exceptionally frequent line of > questions tend to be rooted in what amounts to "eBGP 101/102"(how to turn > up and test a peer and potential pitfalls there-in). While there is already > a "Public Peering Exchange" BCOP and a draft for "IPv6 Peering" is in the > works, it appears that the fundamentals need to be captured and put on > display. Although there are already a handful of SMEs on-board, our goal is > to define the BEST practices so the more insight we can get into this > problem the better! If you are interested in acting as a SME for the "eBGP > Configuration BCOP" please let me know, this is your chance to sow your > expertise across the internet! > > THANKS! > Bill Armstrong > > P.S. > I'll be at NANOG 61 so if you aren't sure about the commitment or have > questions about the BCOP process don't hesitate to track me down for a chat! > > _______________________________________________ > > BCOP mailing list > BCOP at mailman.nanog.org > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/bcop > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/bcop/attachments/20140521/2d507f4f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] [BCOP-discuss] eBGP Configuration BCOP - Call for Volunteer SMEs
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]