This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[bcop] BCOP on DNSSEC
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] BCOP presentation at RIPE meeting in Warsaw
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] BCOP on DNSSEC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthijs Mekking
matthijs at nlnetlabs.nl
Tue Apr 15 10:42:25 CEST 2014
Hi, FYI. Within the IETF, we have two versions of documents describing DNSSEC operational practices for authoritative name servers. These documents are very lengthy because they are considerations and take into account many possibilities. I am now thinking of writing a best current operational practices. To me it makes sense that these can be (at least) two documents, for TLD operators and for hosters of many zones. I hope I can start this activity soon and perhaps I can share some of that work in BCOP at Warsaw. Best regards, Matthijs
- Previous message (by thread): [bcop] BCOP presentation at RIPE meeting in Warsaw
- Next message (by thread): [bcop] BCOP on DNSSEC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ BCOP Archives ]