| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Index Subject Index | <<< Threads >>> |
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
Brian Nisbet wrote:Michele, The query is over the abuse details they have listed in both the RIPE database and places like abuse.net, rather than phone or postal details. That aside, however, currently there is no policy or procedures for RIPE to follow up on incorrect contact information in the database.[...] Nevertheless I have to comment that I perceive it as perversion to explicitely and voluntarily register or maintain an abuse-mailbox: attribute that points to a disfunct mail delivery point...
I absolutely agree and should have made that more clear.
[...]a rehashing of the discussion from last year is unlikely to be helpful without some new input.[...] So, one of the ideas I am having right now - as this attribute is not mandatory and pretty modern - is to develop a slightly more formal procedure to apply to this attribute.
That sounds like a good start. If there is anything I can do to help, please let me know. Brian.
| <<< Chronological >>> | Author Subject | <<< Threads >>> |