Re: [anti-spam-wg] Domains with MX set to localhost


On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:50:38AM -0500, der Mouse wrote:
> How is the second one possible?  An MX record isn't capable of
> containing anything *but* a FQDN.

In theory ;-)

I've seen more than once records like
    example.com	 IN  MX  10  10.0.0.1
i.e. an IP address instead of a FQDN in the RHS of the record and mailservers
even connecting to the correct host :)

DJB's dnscache even has the "feature" to map A queries for IP adresses to
IP addresses:
    $ dig 10.0.0.1
    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    10.0.0.1.               1w14h2m40s IN A  10.0.0.1
Since we use it on our caching DNS servers for the mailservers (I was
really sick explaining customers 5-10 times a week, why their mails won't
reach the destination, as specified by clueless admins) I don't see
problems with that any longer, but I am sure those kind of records are
still there.

	\Maex

-- 
SpaceNet AG            | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development |       D-80807 Muenchen    | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
"The security, stability and reliability of a computer system is reciprocally
 proportional to the amount of vacuity between the ears of the admin"