- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:50:28 -0400 (EDT)
> I think a combination of serveral solution mentioned in this thread
> would be good.
> 1. Standard human and machine readable bounces
> 2. This bounces should contain the orign header of the virus mail.
We already have a standard for this, which is widely ignored. (My
automated filters know how to pick apart multipart/report bounces, but
I get an awful lot that aren't.)
> 3. The mail server shouldn't bounce mails, if the virus is known to
> forged the return path.
What's your stance on simply refusing the mail? That's what I
currently do, and while it does in some sense cause bounces, I'm
certainly not generating them.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B