<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Relays, Blacklists, and Laws


On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Anders Andersson wrote:

> My point being, blacklisting those who are happy to sue MAPS or
> any other blacklisting service in order to obtain an injunction
> or a restraining order is useful only as a preventive measure,
> not as corrective action to be implemented the very day MAPS
> says "sorry guys, but for reasons beyond our control we can no
> longer provide any of our blacklisting services".  Even with a
> separate blacklist for YesMail and others who have threatened
> MAPS in the past, we need MAPS to stay online to tell us about
> all the other petty spammers who simply haven't dared to take
> legal action.

MAPS/ORBS is for telling the world about open relays. Not about the kind
of laywers some people have. If someone sues MAPS/ORBS I'd be happy to
support them if they put the papers online. But I will not blackhole any
individual or ISP that is involved in the legal actions. How am I gonna
explain it to my customer? "Sorry, $ISP is sueing MAPS so you can't
receive mail from your grandfather that uses $ISP".

-- 
/* Sabri Berisha CCNA,BOFH,+iO        O.O        speaking for just myself
 * Join HAL!!: www.HAL2001.org ____oOo_U_oOo____ http://www.bit.nl/~sabri
 *  "We deliver quality services, we just can't get it on the internet"
 *   Anonymous sysadmin - on IRC                                       */






<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>