<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">I would never say you didn’t handle abuse reports. The question is whether that applies to each and every member in the ripe region. </div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Even if a fraction of a percent of members or LIRs are affected by such a policy .. that is like saying there mustn’t be any speed limit because you are a careful and safe driver. </div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">--srs</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Gert Doering <gert@space.net><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, November 30, 2023 7:51:20 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Serge Droz <serge.droz@first.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">Hi,<br>
<br>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 09:53:54AM +0100, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg wrote:<br>
> And as long as this group cannot come up with a compromise nothing will<br>
> change, in essence the anti-abuse wg is taken hostage by the nay sayers.<br>
> These discussions have been going on for years. Nothing new has come out.<br>
<br>
I'd argue the attention budget of the anti-abuse WG is taken hostage by<br>
people bringing the same non-acceptable proposal back again and again...<br>
<br>
Let me repeat that we *do* handle our abuse reports, man our abuse mail<br>
address, and *do* like having working abuse contacts in the RIPE DB - it's<br>
just that this proposal at hand will do just plain nothing to improve<br>
the situation, while at the same hand annoying (and putting at potential<br>
risk if something slips) those that already do the right thing.<br>
<br>
No positive effect, but measurable drawbacks, so not a good way forward,<br>
no matter how often this is re-started.<br>
<br>
Gert Doering<br>
-- NetMaster<br>
-- <br>
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?<br>
<br>
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer<br>
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann<br>
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)<br>
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>