<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 30 Nov 2023, at 12:38, Leo Vegoda <leo@vegoda.org> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div><div>On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 13:16, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite"><br>On Thu 30/Nov/2023 12:40:46 +0100 Laura Atkins wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">What happens if / when someone doesn’t?<br></blockquote><br>A minimal, yet useful reaction would be to remove their abuse PoC from RDAP<br>pages. If the convention is clear that network operators without abuse-c are<br>non-responders, it is easy for all the others to add the corresponding IPs to<br>their drop lists. Ripe NCC could even distribute non-responders lists.<br><br>A motion to reclaim wasted resources can be set up at a later time.<br></blockquote><br>Publishing factual data that others can use to inform their own<br>decision making processes seems quite different from reclaiming<br>resources. A more productive path to evaluate.<br></div></div></blockquote><br></div><div><br></div><div>The question is: how much will it cost to do this and how much will it actually improve anything?</div><div><br></div><div>laura </div><br><div> <meta charset="UTF-8">-- <br>The Delivery Expert<br><br>Laura Atkins<br>Word to the Wise<br>laura@wordtothewise.com<br><br>Delivery hints and commentary: http://wordtothewise.com/blog<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span><br><br><br><br><br><br> </div> <br></body></html>