<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">As long as you publish it </div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">--srs</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Leo Vegoda <leo@vegoda.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, November 30, 2023 6:08:59 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it><br>
<b>Cc:</b> anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 13:16, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Thu 30/Nov/2023 12:40:46 +0100 Laura Atkins wrote:<br>
> > What happens if / when someone doesn’t?<br>
><br>
> A minimal, yet useful reaction would be to remove their abuse PoC from RDAP<br>
> pages. If the convention is clear that network operators without abuse-c are<br>
> non-responders, it is easy for all the others to add the corresponding IPs to<br>
> their drop lists. Ripe NCC could even distribute non-responders lists.<br>
><br>
> A motion to reclaim wasted resources can be set up at a later time.<br>
<br>
Publishing factual data that others can use to inform their own<br>
decision making processes seems quite different from reclaiming<br>
resources. A more productive path to evaluate.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Leo<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit:
<a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>