<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">A good friend who is a former regulator told me exactly this. I’ll share that bottle with you, Serge :)</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="direction:ltr">--srs</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, November 30, 2023 3:20:29 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">As I said<br>
<br>
I disagree. Gmail says what you can do with their accounts, that doesn't <br>
make them a regulator. But it doesn't matter: At the end of the day it's <br>
excuses to not do anything about a growing problem.<br>
<br>
And what typically happens in such cases is that states get upset and <br>
start dictating the rules, i.e. the real regulators come out. At this <br>
point the community has pretty much lost the ability to shape the rules.<br>
<br>
I bet a good bottle of you favorite drink, that this is what will happen.<br>
<br>
Best<br>
Serge<br>
<br>
On 30.11.23 09:58, Matthias Merkel wrote:<br>
> Hi Serge,<br>
> <br>
> The difference is the scope of the rules.<br>
> <br>
> All organizations, including the RIPE NCC, enforce rules as part of <br>
> their own business, for example with customers, etc.<br>
> <br>
> What is being proposed here is imposing rules on unrelated things. Abuse <br>
> isn't inherently of the resources provided by RIPE, but rather of the <br>
> services addressed by them. It's like the postal service making rules on <br>
> what you can do at your house because it has an address assigned by them.<br>
> <br>
> This is the difference between regulator or not. The definition I cited <br>
> is from the dictionary.<br>
> <br>
> —<br>
> Maria Merkel<br>
> <br>
> This email was sent by [company]. Any statements contained in this email <br>
> are personal to the author and are not necessarily the statements of the <br>
> company unless specifically stated.<br>
> <br>
> Novecore and Staclar are collective trading names of Novecore Ltd., <br>
> registered in England and Wales under company number 11748197, Novecore <br>
> Licensing Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number <br>
> 11544982, Staclar Carrier Ltd., registered in England and Wales under <br>
> company number 12219686, Staclar Financial Services Ltd., registered in <br>
> England and Wales under company number 13843292 (registered offices 54 <br>
> Portland Place, London, UK, W1B 1DY); Novecore Professional Services <br>
> Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number 13965912 <br>
> (registered office 13 Freeland Park, Wareham Road, Poole, UK, BH16 6FA); <br>
> Novecore (Estonia) OÜ, registered in Estonia under registry code <br>
> 16543205 (local contact Baltic Business Services OÜ, Narva mnt 5, 10117 <br>
> Tallinn, Estonia); Novecore (USA) Inc., registered in Delaware under <br>
> file number 6707907, Novecore Licensing (USA) LLC, registered in <br>
> Delaware under file number 4030866, and Staclar, Inc., registered in <br>
> Delaware under file number 7413401 (registered agents The Corporation <br>
> Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange St, Wilmington DE <br>
> 19801, USA). Novecore Licensing Ltd. is registered for VAT in the United <br>
> Kingdom under VAT registration number 347 4545 80. Novecore (Estonia) OÜ <br>
> is registered for VAT in the European Union under VAT registration <br>
> number EE102518979. Novecore Professional Services Ltd. is a trust or <br>
> company service provider registered with and supervised by HM Revenue & <br>
> Customs under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of <br>
> Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (registration number <br>
> XMML00000178208). Staclar Financial Services Ltd. is an Annex 1 <br>
> financial institution registered with and supervised by the Financial <br>
> Conduct Authority under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and <br>
> Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (firm <br>
> reference number 989521). Registration is not equivalent to <br>
> authorisation and is not an endorsement to do business with a firm. <br>
> Staclar Financial Services Ltd. is not an authorised person within the <br>
> meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and does not <br>
> review, approve, or endorse financial promotions for securities issues <br>
> it is involved in or provide any form of investment advice.<br>
> Sent from Front<br>
>> On November 30, 2023 at 9:54 AM GMT+1 anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <br>
>> <<a href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net">mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I do not agree<br>
>><br>
>> Every organization has rules it enforces. That doesn't make it a<br>
>> regulator. The public transport here, where I live enforces that you<br>
>> have a valid ticket. That doesn't make it the transport regulator.<br>
>><br>
>> In fact RIPE NCC will probably enforce that you pay your fees.<br>
>><br>
>> The issue here is, that we have two subgroups:<br>
>><br>
>> One that thinks we should try go a bit further to ensure that people do<br>
>> what can be expected they should be doing, and another fractions that<br>
>> feels every little bit of additional load is too much and will not solve<br>
>> the problem 100%. It's like saying we give up on speed limits because it<br>
>> doesn't prevent speeding.<br>
>><br>
>> And as long as this group cannot come up with a compromise nothing will<br>
>> change, in essence the anti-abuse wg is taken hostage by the nay sayers.<br>
>> These discussions have been going on for years. Nothing new has come out.<br>
>><br>
>> We don't even try. We could, and then see if it makes a difference. If<br>
>> not we go back. But nope.<br>
>><br>
>> Best<br>
>> Serge<br>
>><br>
>> On 30.11.23 09:39, Matthias Merkel wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> > Hi Leo,<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > The definition of a regulator is an entity that sets and enforces <br>
>>> rules<br>
>>> > on the persons it supervises.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > If the RIPE NCC goes further than just providing numbers, and instead<br>
>>> > enforces rules on usage associated with them (note that this doesn't<br>
>>> > even concern the use of the numbers themselves, but rather services<br>
>>> > addressed by them), it will, by definition, be a regulator.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > I'm not sure that there will be consensus on wanting the NCC to <br>
>>> become a<br>
>>> > regulator.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > —<br>
>>> > Maria Merkel<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > This email was sent by Staclar, Inc. Any statements contained in this<br>
>>> > email are personal to the author and are not necessarily the <br>
>>> statements<br>
>>> > of the company unless specifically stated.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > Novecore and Staclar are collective trading names of Novecore Ltd.,<br>
>>> > registered in England and Wales under company number 11748197, <br>
>>> Novecore<br>
>>> > Licensing Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number<br>
>>> > 11544982, Staclar Carrier Ltd., registered in England and Wales under<br>
>>> > company number 12219686, Staclar Financial Services Ltd., <br>
>>> registered in<br>
>>> > England and Wales under company number 13843292 (registered offices 54<br>
>>> > Portland Place, London, UK, W1B 1DY); Novecore Professional Services<br>
>>> > Ltd., registered in England and Wales under company number 13965912<br>
>>> > (registered office 13 Freeland Park, Wareham Road, Poole, UK, BH16 <br>
>>> 6FA);<br>
>>> > Novecore (Estonia) OÜ, registered in Estonia under registry code<br>
>>> > 16543205 (local contact Baltic Business Services OÜ, Narva mnt 5, <br>
>>> 10117<br>
>>> > Tallinn, Estonia); Novecore (USA) Inc., registered in Delaware under<br>
>>> > file number 6707907, Novecore Licensing (USA) LLC, registered in<br>
>>> > Delaware under file number 4030866, and Staclar, Inc., registered in<br>
>>> > Delaware under file number 7413401 (registered agents The Corporation<br>
>>> > Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange St, Wilmington DE<br>
>>> > 19801, USA). Novecore Licensing Ltd. is registered for VAT in the <br>
>>> United<br>
>>> > Kingdom under VAT registration number 347 4545 80. Novecore <br>
>>> (Estonia) OÜ<br>
>>> > is registered for VAT in the European Union under VAT registration<br>
>>> > number EE102518979. Novecore Professional Services Ltd. is a trust or<br>
>>> > company service provider registered with and supervised by HM <br>
>>> Revenue &<br>
>>> > Customs under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and <br>
>>> Transfer of<br>
>>> > Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (registration number<br>
>>> > XMML00000178208). Staclar Financial Services Ltd. is an Annex 1<br>
>>> > financial institution registered with and supervised by the Financial<br>
>>> > Conduct Authority under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and<br>
>>> > Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (firm<br>
>>> > reference number 989521). Registration is not equivalent to<br>
>>> > authorisation and is not an endorsement to do business with a firm.<br>
>>> > Staclar Financial Services Ltd. is not an authorised person within the<br>
>>> > meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and does not<br>
>>> > review, approve, or endorse financial promotions for securities issues<br>
>>> > it is involved in or provide any form of investment advice.<br>
>>> > Sent from Front<br>
>>> >> On November 30, 2023 at 9:36 AM GMT+1 anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <br>
>>> <<a href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net">mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net</a>><br>
>>> >> <<a href=""></a>mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <<a href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net">mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net</a>>> wrote:<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Hi Leo,<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> I don’t see it as a regulator, I see it as one of the functions of a<br>
>>> >> RIR. Not just provide numbers, but also ensure that they are being<br>
>>> >> used fairly and according community agreed policies. Otherwise we<br>
>>> >> could also say that other reasons for recovery are invalid because we<br>
>>> >> become a regulator, right?<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Each RIR has measured the “level of adoption” as they progressed with<br>
>>> >> the initial verification (and this was presented at least a couple of<br>
>>> >> times in every RIR), so there are slides in each of them, showing the<br>
>>> >> progress. I can try to find them for you in the previous year's <br>
>>> events<br>
>>> >> if you can’t find them. Also my personal experience reporting over<br>
>>> >> 1.500 abuse cases, average per day, shows that I get more<br>
>>> >> “happy-ending” responses from those regions than before and keeps<br>
>>> >> going better and better, which is not the case from RIPE <br>
>>> unfortunately.<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> Regards,<br>
>>> >> Jordi<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >> @jordipalet<br>
>>> >><br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>> > El 29 nov 2023, a las 16:09, Leo Vegoda <leo@vegoda.org <br>
>>> <<a href="mailto:leo@vegoda.org">mailto:leo@vegoda.org</a>><br>
>>> >>> <<a href=""></a>mailto:leo@vegoda.org <<a href="mailto:leo@vegoda.org">mailto:leo@vegoda.org</a>>>> escribió:<br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>> > Hi Jordi,<br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>> > On Nov 29, 2023, at 11:29, jordi.palet--- via anti-abuse-wg<br>
>>> >>> <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <<a href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net">mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net</a>>
<br>
>>> <<a href=""></a>mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <<a href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net">mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net</a>>>> wrote:<br>
>>> >>> >><br>
>>> >>> >> I agree that the carrot is better than the stick, but if the<br>
>>> >>> carrot doesn’t work, we need to use the stick.<br>
>>> >>> >><br>
>>> >>> >> My original proposal was basically enforcing the NCC to reclaim<br>
>>> >>> the resources when there is a persistent violation of resolving <br>
>>> abuse<br>
>>> >>> cases. This can be progressive, such as not allowing to update<br>
>>> >>> objects in the database, etc. No need to go with “a single failure<br>
>>> >>> means you lose your resources”.<br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>> > How could we do this without the RIPE NCC becoming some kind of<br>
>>> >>> regulator? Or is the proposal to make the RIPE NCC a private sector<br>
>>> >>> regulator?<br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>> >> As said, this is working in other 2 regions, one more coming<br>
>>> >>> (pending of the AFRINIC board ratification). Why should not work in<br>
>>> >>> this region the same? Also the PoC in ARIN works in a similar way,<br>
>>> >>> and being non-responsive means you get some “members” rights <br>
>>> restricted.<br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>> > Who has been measuring the reduction is abuse? How tightly is that<br>
>>> >>> drop in abuse linked to this policy action rather than other factors?<br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>> > Kind regards,<br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>> > Leo<br>
>>> >>> ><br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>> **********************************************<br>
>>> >>> IPv4 is over<br>
>>> >>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?<br>
>>> >>> <a href="http://www.theipv6company.com">http://www.theipv6company.com</a> <<a href="http://www.theipv6company.com/">http://www.theipv6company.com/</a>>
<br>
>>> <<a href=""></a>http://www.theipv6company.com/ <<a href="http://www.theipv6company.com/">http://www.theipv6company.com/</a>>><br>
>>> >>> The IPv6 Company<br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged<br>
>>> >>> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive<br>
>>> >>> use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty<br>
>>> >>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents<br>
>>> >>> of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is<br>
>>> >>> strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If <br>
>>> you<br>
>>> >>> are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, <br>
>>> copying,<br>
>>> >>> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if<br>
>>> >>> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be<br>
>>> >>> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original<br>
>>> >>> sender to inform about this communication and delete it.<br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>> --<br>
>>> >>><br>
>>> >>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or<br>
>>> >>> change your subscription options, please visit:<br>
>>> >>> <a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a>
<br>
>>> <<a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a>><br>
>>> >>> <<a href=""></a>https://mailman.ripe.net/ <br>
>>> <<a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a>>><br>
>>> ><br>
>>><br>
>>> -- <br>
>>> Dr. Serge Droz<br>
>>> Member, FIRST Board of Directors<br>
>>> <a href="https://www.first.org">https://www.first.org</a> <<a href="https://www.first.org/">https://www.first.org/</a>><br>
>>><br>
>>> -- <br>
>>><br>
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or <br>
>>> change your subscription options, please visit: <br>
>>> <a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a>
<br>
>>> <<a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a>><br>
> <br>
<br>
-- <br>
Dr. Serge Droz<br>
Member, FIRST Board of Directors<br>
<a href="https://www.first.org">https://www.first.org</a><br>
<br>
-- <br>
<br>
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit:
<a href="https://mailman.ripe.net/">https://mailman.ripe.net/</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>