<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> </head> <body> <div> <div> <div> <div style="direction: ltr;">Stewardship and fiduciary responsibility for IP space. Now that’s a much needed and sadly lacking thing.</div> </div> <div><br> </div> <div class="ms-outlook-ios-signature"> <div style="direction: ltr;">--srs</div> </div> </div> <div> </div> <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1"> <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif"><b>From:</b> anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Randy Bush <randy@psg.com><br> <b>Sent:</b> Friday, January 17, 2020 8:33 AM<br> <b>To:</b> Suresh Ramasubramanian<br> <b>Cc:</b> anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox") <div> </div> </font></div> > Database and routing people who havenʼt worked security or donʼt want <br> > security roles trying to lecture people who work cert and abuse roles <br> > on why something abuse mitigation related wonʼt work is always <br> > interesting. Not you Randy but many other posters in this thread. <br> <br> lecturing such bs at folk who have been doing routing, database, and <br> security since before you discovered the internet is part of what i <br> meant by not being constructive. <br> <br> vigilantes seem to lack stewardship. qed <br> <br> plonk <br> <br> randy, with apologies to the audience <br> <br> </div> </body> </html>