<html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252"> </head> <body> <div> <div> <div> <div style="direction: ltr;">It’d be interesting to take individual names of the people most vocal in their objections and feed them through LinkedIn - that assumption you made about dealing with spam would soon be tested.</div> </div> <div><br> </div> <div class="ms-outlook-ios-signature"> <div style="direction: ltr;">--srs</div> </div> </div> <div> </div> <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1"> <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif"><b>From:</b> anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Randy Bush <randy@psg.com><br> <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:44 PM<br> <b>To:</b> Sara Veronica Marcolla<br> <b>Cc:</b> anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox") <div> </div> </font></div> > I do not see so far any concrete proposal in the sense of addressing <br> > issues, only shooting down proposals (for good or bad reasons <br> <br> the desire to stop a whack-a-mole does not imply a responsibility to <br> make moles. <br> <br> a lot of folk here actually deal with spam, or likely they would not be <br> on this list. this does not oblige them to support all proposals. <br> <br> randy <br> <br> </div> </body> </html>