<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"> <style></style> </head> <body lang="FR" link="blue" vlink="purple"> <div class="WordSection1"> As co-authors, if we propose this policy, that's because we believe that improving the Whois reliability is good for the Internet.<o:p></o:p> With regard to the first analysis conducted by the RIPE NCC, about 10%-25% of the current 70,000 distinct abuse contact emails seem technically incorrect, this implies that between 7,000 and 17,500 email addresses are not working ones.<o:p></o:p> If contacted by the RIPE NCC, resource holders will be requested to fix this information and will be able to receive abuse notifications. So there will be a significant difference between receiving something vs receiving anything. <o:p></o:p> Perhaps a part of these holders don't care but they will be contactable. The other part will be educated about this abuse-c field during the process. <o:p></o:p> And an annual checking would ensure that the contacts remain more up-to-date.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Regards<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Herv�<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> -----Message d'origine----- De : anti-abuse-wg [mailto:anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net] De la part de ox Envoy� : lundi 19 mars 2018 03:23 � : JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg Objet : Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Decision on Proposal 2017-02 <o:p> </o:p> On Sun, 18 Mar 2018 13:43:54 +0000<o:p></o:p> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via anti-abuse-wg <<a href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net">anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p> <snip> <o:p></o:p> > I'm not a lawyer, but deal a lot with them, and I'm sure anyway, there <o:p></o:p> > are more informed voices even from the NCC that can confirm, and <o:p></o:p> > actually it will be interesting to confirm.<o:p></o:p> > <o:p></o:p> +1<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> I would like to also present the other side of the same argument:<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> If the NCC provides a platform that supplies fake/false/wrong information it could also attract arguments of legal liability...<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Similarly, if the NCC does not provide abuse contact information there could also be legal arguments that this is a dereliction of trust with regards public resource management and that also opens up arguments of liability...<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> So, this would be most interesting to confirm.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Regards<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Andre<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> </div> <PRE>_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. </PRE></body> </html>