<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Texte brut Car";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
span.TextebrutCar
{mso-style-name:"Texte brut Car";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Texte brut";
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:black;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="FR" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Hello Nick,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">We have already talked with the RIPE NCC about ARC.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">If the ARC would include actual contact validation, a same LIR would be contacted less frequently for a global audit.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Dealing specifically with abuse-c validation, RIPE NCC Impact Analysis will answer the question of extra work evaluation.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">Hervé<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="mso-fareast-language:FR">-----Message d'origine-----<br>
De : anti-abuse-wg [mailto:anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net] De la part de Nick Hilliard<br>
Envoyé : lundi 9 octobre 2017 13:01<br>
À : Michele Neylon - Blacknight<br>
Cc : ox; Gert Doering; anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<br>
Objet : Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02 New Policy Proposal (Regular abuse-c Validation)</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">> The current situation is that abuse-c can be populated with rubbish.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">> The email addresses can be completely non-functioning.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">> That is the real and current issue.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">the real issue is that this is a complex layer 9 problem inside each organisation, and although creating technological tickbox policies will provide a veneer of doing something, that veneer is very thin.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">The RIPE NCC already has a mechanism for information consistency audits, namely the Assisted Registry Check.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Has anyone talked to the RIPE NCC about including abuse contacts in the ARC, and been given credible reasons as to why this wouldn't be a simpler, better and more effective way of dealing with issue of stale / inaccurate details?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText">Nick<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<PRE>_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
</PRE></body>
</html>