<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV>Brian wrote today:</DIV>> I'm clearly going to have to point out, again,
that this list is not the <BR>> place for any ad hominem attacks.
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Third time to be exact.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>> I know people will probably claim this is censorious or
something.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>It's not censorship. In this particular case it is conspiracy, complicity,
gang formation, whatever.</DIV>
<DIV>18 months denouncing the same ISP with the same scammer. Some of the
complaints were copied to abuse@ripe.net in the hope that they would interfere
with their client. Nothing was made.</DIV>
<DIV>Oh yes, the statute does not envisage such an attitude. If this is alleged
in any court certainly will be questioned about the company's social
responsibility. And having received evidence of illegal activity practiced by a
customer for so long, why not investigated or reported...</DIV>
<DIV>Hide behind a statute to protect your bad customers is a petty attitude,
dishonest and greedy.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>> and without guessing at the motives behind why <BR>> someone did
something.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Guessing??? Before writing such bullshit you should have the decency to
look at the evidence of the crimes committed by your client. It's amazing how
you all make up facts to disqualify denunciations. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Marilson</DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV
style='FONT-SIZE: small; TEXT-DECORATION: none; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri"; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: #000000; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline'></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title=anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net
href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net">anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Monday, May 29, 2017 9:16 AM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net">anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 66, Issue
14</DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style='FONT-SIZE: small; TEXT-DECORATION: none; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri"; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: #000000; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline'>
<DIV><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message:
1<BR>Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 13:38:16 +0200<BR>From: Brian Nisbet
<brian.nisbet@heanet.ie><BR>To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<BR>Subject: Re:
[anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists<BR>Message-ID:
<f0254b21-a9b8-13ba-efd2-c357e5cef70c@heanet.ie><BR>Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed<BR><BR>Folks,<BR><BR>I'm clearly going
to have to point out, again, that this list is not the <BR>place for any ad
hominem attacks. It's that simple. And yes, calling <BR>someone a sociopath or a
Nazi counts.<BR><BR>I know people will probably claim this is censorious or
something. It <BR>isn't. The discussions and information sharing can take place
without <BR>these kind of references and without guessing at the motives behind
why <BR>someone did something.<BR><BR>Brian<BR><BR>Brian Nisbet<BR>Network
Operations Manager<BR>HEAnet CLG, Ireland's National Education and Research
Network<BR>1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin D01 X8N7,
Ireland<BR>+35316609040 brian.nisbet@heanet.ie www.heanet.ie<BR>Registered in
Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV align=center>TRUNCATED</DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>