<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV>Thank you very much Mr chair or co-chair... whatever...</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You did again. You picked up my answer to Mr. Jeffrey and eliminated
paragraphs and spaces. You put it all together. With my bad English nor I
understand what I wrote.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The RIPE reminds me of the bathhouse (a euphemism for a brothel) from the
movie Miyazaki's Spirited Away. A dark tale where Chihiro has to satisfy a
series of grotesque customers. And always working in the shadows under the cloak
of "refined persons".</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Marilson</DIV>
<DIV>----------------------------------------------------------------------
<DIV
style='FONT-SIZE: small; TEXT-DECORATION: none; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri"; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: #000000; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline'></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<DIV><FONT size=3 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A
title=anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net
href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net">anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net</A>
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, February 04, 2017 12:24 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
href="mailto:anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net">anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 63, Issue 10</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style='FONT-SIZE: small; TEXT-DECORATION: none; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri"; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; COLOR: #000000; FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline'>Send
anti-abuse-wg mailing list submissions to<BR>anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<BR><BR>To
subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
visit<BR>https://mailman.ripe.net/<BR>or, via email,
send a message with subject or body 'help'
to<BR>anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net<BR><BR>You can reach the person managing
the list at<BR>anti-abuse-wg-owner@ripe.net<BR><BR>When replying, please edit
your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of anti-abuse-wg
digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR> 1. Re: anti-abuse-wg
Digest, Vol 63, Issue 8
(Marilson)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message:
1<BR>Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 12:24:31 -0200<BR>From: "Marilson"
<marilson.mapa@gmail.com><BR>To: <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net><BR>Cc:
jrace@attglobal.net, andre@ox.co.za<BR>Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg]
anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 63, Issue 8<BR>Message-ID:
<13AE051340D540B0AB1C4DF421990193@xPC><BR>Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"<BR><BR>Tell me, are you open to criticism or are
cowards.<BR><BR>> Really, none of this is useful or in any way related to
network abuse.<BR><BR>That phrase would only make sense if it were said before
distilling your poison. If it were said before sending me away politely. You
could say, hey man, you are not welcome here, go away. Or you can say this
"politely" as you did, but it's the same thing. What you call politeness is, in
fact, hypocrisy. It is the acts that qualify people, not what they write.
<BR><BR>> This is a list to discuss, in a professional manner, ways to deal,
via technology, policy or other methods, with abuse on the Internet.<BR><BR>It
is what you have been doing for three years (?) Without any consequence or
reduction of abuse to the internet user.<BR><BR>> Thankfully this is what the
vast, vast majority of people on this list do.<BR><BR>The vast, vast majority of
people on this list represent ISPs ? they are fox taking care of
henhouse.<BR><BR>> It is not a place to attack others<BR><BR>I've been
attacked several times, as I am now, and no one says shit.<BR><BR>> It's a
place to work together, to find common ground and to reach consensus
<BR><BR>There was always consensus in this pro-abuse-wg.<BR><BR>> It is also
not a place to directly report abuse. <BR><BR>The directly report abuse shows
how and who is practicing abuse. But you're right. This is useless information
because the goal is not to outlaw the criminal actions of ISPs, but rather to
guarantee the billing that this criminal attitude achieves.<BR><BR>> If you
aren't here for that, then I suggest you go somewhere else on the Internet.
<BR><BR>This is the third time you've sent me away. Here, where the main
perpetrators of Internet abuse are protected, is the right place. If you knew
for whom I send hidden copy you would not be so comfortable in your easy
speech.<BR><BR>Mr. Jeffrey Race,<BR>most members of this group ?do not adopt
revolutionary strategies not because they are too stupid to do so but because it
is contrary to their interests.?<BR>Jeffrey, do you want deny this affirmation
for the second time? Remember that? 1973?<BR>You decided to judge me without
knowing anything at all about me. Perhaps this kind of behavior explains why
your analyzes were criticized by your colleagues in America. I think you spent
too much time in Thailand. And until today you have not learned that to analyze
facts, behaviors, policies it is necessary to know the facts, the causes, the
interrelationships. Or his verbiage will be no more than preconceptions.<BR>"Mr.
Race is at least consistent in ignoring the facts." (The New York Review)<BR>I
have 8,906 files with 750 MB of evidence against ISPs, evidence of fascist,
psychotic and dishonest behavior from owners and ISP staff - evidence of abuse
against humanity. Collected for three years. So, my dear, do not ignore the
facts.<BR>> analysis based on evidence<BR>Do not dare say that this group
uses evidence and I complain without proof. Whenever I tried to show types of
abuse with evidence, they were censored. See how long this group exists and tell
me if the abuse on the internet has had any reduction. This group exists to give
a certain seriousness to the system that is rotten from so RIPE and dishonest.
This group exists to ensure the permanence of the current status quo. After all
are only 473 billion spam PER DAY.<BR>> you use the word 'fascist' which has
a precise meaning in political science apparently as some generalized
condemnation.<BR>> Psychopathy again has a precise definition in its field
which you apparently don't know.<BR><BR>Only you use this words with "a precise
meaning in political science". For you, fascist must be a member of an
undemocratic, authoritarian political regime centered on the figure of a
dictator, right? Dude, you're still in your '50s America, a naive and prosperous
society. I'll tell you a "novelty": the word fascist has synonyms ?
authoritarian, totalitarian, autocratic, extreme right-winger, Nazi,
blackshirt... And, if you are a psychopath or sociopath, you will be preferred
to a CEO position. Why? The sociopath feels no empathy for people, or by family
members. This is the professional that shareholders want. He will cheat, lie,
deceive and steal millions of people without remorse. I do not need to give you
examples, do I? And they are all REFINED PEOPLE par excellence. And people like
you, Jeffrey, will always extend the red carpet to them. What counts is
appearance and hypocrisy. This is basic sociology. I hope it is helpful to this
group. <BR><BR>> If you can limit your future contributions to the subject
and the expectations of this group I am sure our colleagues will be happy to
have you with us.<BR><BR><BR>My cultural and humanistic education (architect),
my sense of justice, my duty as a citizen, my responsibility to my fellow
citizens, prevent me from limiting myself to the expectations of this group. I
want to put my head on the pillow and sleep, as always. I'll give you some
advice Jeffrey, do not try to be sarcastic. Sarcasm is for smart
people.<BR><BR>By the way Jeffrey, your text is fraught with abuse and insult,
ask Andre.<BR>In the first paragraph you called me inappropriate. In the second,
ignorant. On the third, rude. In the fourth, violator of norms. Fifth, you tried
to be sarcastic with my supposed inadequacy. And in the sixth, you sent me
away.<BR><BR>Who gave you the right to address me in this way? You're too
arrogant. You act like a bastard with the appearance of REFINED PEOPLE.<BR>The
fact that you insult me by using the REFINED PEOPLE technique does not give you
the exemption you intend. It just ranks you as hypocritical. Your concept of
morality and good manners is unworthy and rotten. It is based on appearance and
hypocrisy.<BR><BR>If I had a time machine I would send you to your dear 50's
America.<BR><BR>With love from 1950s<BR>Marilson<BR>From:
anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net <BR>Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 9:00
AM<BR>To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <BR>Subject: anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 63,
Issue 8<BR><BR>Send anti-abuse-wg mailing list submissions
to<BR>anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
Wide Web, visit<BR>https://mailman.ripe.net/<BR>or,
via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to<BR>anti-abuse-wg-request@ripe.net<BR><BR>You can reach the person managing
the list at<BR>anti-abuse-wg-owner@ripe.net<BR><BR>When replying, please edit
your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of anti-abuse-wg
digest..."<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR> 1. Re: Language on
List (ox)<BR> 2. Re: Language on List (Brian Nisbet)<BR>
3. Draft Minutes: RIPE73 AA-WG Meeting (Brian
Nisbet)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message:
1<BR>Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:27:05 +0200<BR>From: ox
<andre@ox.co.za><BR>To: "Jeffrey Race" <jrace@attglobal.net><BR>Cc:
"anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net" <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net><BR>Subject: Re:
[anti-abuse-wg] Language on List<BR>Message-ID:
<mailman.2.1486119602.29152.anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net><BR>Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII<BR><BR>On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 21:24:10
-0500<BR>"Jeffrey Race" <jrace@attglobal.net>
wrote:<BR><snip><BR>> define yourself as refined or coarse.
Coarse people<BR>> have fewer life opportunities because they are viewed
as<BR>> inconsiderate of refined persons (who mostly control the<BR>>
worlds institutions). <BR>> <BR>Goes back again to the 'definition of
abuse' What is abuse?<BR><BR>I could argue that Jeffrey Race posting about
"refined persons"<BR>controlling "coarse persons" is abuse in itself.
<BR><BR>The "slavery" mentality (fits in with the extremely offensive
and<BR>very sexist "Ladies & Gentlemen") - slavery plantations in the
USA<BR>south much?<BR><BR>You do realize that some of us has worked, seen and
dealt with<BR>aberrations of atrocities so offensive as to cause severe stress
(for<BR>those among us that are not sociopaths)<BR><BR>> This is basic
sociology. I hope it is helpful to my fellow<BR>> list members.<BR>>
Jeffrey Race<BR>> <BR>If you are completely honest with your self, admit that
there are other tenets<BR>of basic sociology that you are ignoring in your
generalized statement.<BR><BR>And again, pointing out that "refined people"
control the world, is not<BR>helpful at
all.<BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date:
Fri, 3 Feb 2017 08:53:36 +0000<BR>From: Brian Nisbet
<brian.nisbet@heanet.ie><BR>To: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net<BR>Subject: Re:
[anti-abuse-wg] Language on List<BR>Message-ID:
<6d5b4e65-f23d-9f2f-3729-dda7e4a01dda@heanet.ie><BR>Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252<BR><BR>Folks,<BR><BR>Really, none of this is
useful or in any way related to network
abuse.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR><BR>Brian<BR>Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG<BR><BR>Brian Nisbet,
Network Operations Manager<BR>HEAnet CLG, Ireland's Education and Research
Network<BR>1st Floor, 5 George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1<BR>Registered in Ireland,
no 275301 tel: +35316609040 fax: +35316603666<BR>web:
http://www.heanet.ie/<BR><BR>On 03/02/2017 05:27, ox wrote:<BR>> On Thu, 02
Feb 2017 21:24:10 -0500<BR>> "Jeffrey Race" <jrace@attglobal.net>
wrote:<BR>> <snip><BR>>> define yourself as refined or
coarse. Coarse people<BR>>> have fewer life opportunities because
they are viewed as<BR>>> inconsiderate of refined persons (who mostly
control the<BR>>> worlds institutions). <BR>>><BR>> Goes
back again to the 'definition of abuse' What is abuse?<BR>> <BR>> I could
argue that Jeffrey Race posting about "refined persons"<BR>> controlling
"coarse persons" is abuse in itself. <BR>> <BR>> The "slavery" mentality
(fits in with the extremely offensive and<BR>> very sexist "Ladies &
Gentlemen") - slavery plantations in the USA<BR>> south much?<BR>>
<BR>> You do realize that some of us has worked, seen and dealt with<BR>>
aberrations of atrocities so offensive as to cause severe stress (for<BR>>
those among us that are not sociopaths)<BR>> <BR>>> This is basic
sociology. I hope it is helpful to my fellow<BR>>> list
members.<BR>>> Jeffrey Race<BR>>><BR>> If you are completely
honest with your self, admit that there are other tenets<BR>> of basic
sociology that you are ignoring in your generalized statement.<BR>> <BR>>
And again, pointing out that "refined people" control the world, is not<BR>>
helpful at all.<BR>>
<BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 3<BR>Date: Fri, 3
Feb 2017 08:54:44 +0000<BR>From: Brian Nisbet
<brian.nisbet@heanet.ie><BR>To: "'anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net'"
<anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net><BR>Subject: [anti-abuse-wg] Draft Minutes: RIPE73
AA-WG Meeting<BR>Message-ID:
<a0d87d0c-5599-202f-7567-e09d0ce44a99@heanet.ie><BR>Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"<BR><BR>Colleagues,<BR><BR>I've attached the draft
minutes, lovingly prepared by the RIPE NCC, from<BR>our last meeting in
Madrid.<BR><BR>If you have any comments or corrections, please let me
know.<BR><BR>Brian<BR><BR>-- <BR>Brian Nisbet, Network Operations
Manager<BR>HEAnet CLG, Ireland's Education and Research Network<BR>1st Floor, 5
George's Dock, IFSC, Dublin 1<BR>Registered in Ireland, no 275301 tel:
+35316609040 fax: +35316603666<BR>web:
http://www.heanet.ie/<BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>A non-text
attachment was scrubbed...<BR>Name: AA-Minutes-RIPE73.rtf<BR>Type:
text/rtf<BR>Size: 9654 bytes<BR>Desc: not available<BR>URL:
</ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170203/76b5b016/attachment-0001.bin><BR><BR>End
of anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 63, Issue
8<BR>********************************************<BR>-------------- next part
--------------<BR>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>URL:
</ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20170204/d9676c57/attachment.html><BR><BR>End
of anti-abuse-wg Digest, Vol 63, Issue
10<BR>*********************************************<BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>