<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<h1>Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)<br>
<span class="jnenbez">§ 240</span> <span class="jnentitel">Nötigung</span></h1>
<div>
<div class="jnhtml">
<div>
<div class="jurAbsatz">(1) Wer einen Menschen rechtswidrig mit
Gewalt oder durch Drohung mit einem empfindlichen Übel zu
einer Handlung, Duldung oder Unterlassung nötigt, wird mit
Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe
bestraft.</div>
<div class="jurAbsatz">(2) Rechtswidrig ist die Tat, wenn die
Anwendung der Gewalt oder die Androhung des Übels zu dem
angestrebten Zweck als verwerflich anzusehen ist.</div>
<div class="jurAbsatz">(3) Der Versuch ist strafbar.</div>
<div class="jurAbsatz">(4) In besonders schweren Fällen ist
die Strafe Freiheitsstrafe von sechs Monaten bis zu fünf
Jahren. Ein besonders schwerer Fall liegt in der Regel vor,
wenn der Täter
<dl
style="font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;">
<dt>1.</dt>
<dd
style="font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;">
<div>eine Schwangere zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch nötigt
oder</div>
</dd>
<dt>2.</dt>
<dd
style="font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;">
<div>seine Befugnisse oder seine Stellung als Amtsträger
mißbraucht.</div>
</dd>
</dl>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>being forced to spend manhours (= money) to 'delist' from
3rd party dns blacklists is 'empflindliche uebel', and yes
you are forcing them into a 'handlung (delisting/acting
AGAINST their paying customer), duldung (ignoring the fact
that you call them and others affected by your block
'spammers') or 'unterlassung' (interfering with their
provider immunity and right to sell services to anyone,
anywhere, and keep doing so - as long as those don't break
the law -there- and even if they do you can still sell
them services as that's their problem -there- not yours.
per-se. ;)<br>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
now. that's just the blackmail part and just the BRD part... other
eu memberstates usually have simular laws...<br>
<br>
if you knowingly and willingly insert ips into a blackmail
infrastructure which you have advertised with the argument that you
KNOW a listing has impact on 1/3rd of the worlds mail delivery, or
worse, such as spamhaus DROP, where you KNOW a listing causes part
of the internet to completely drop that traffic, as you advertise it
just for -that- purpose and know how many nodes use it, that
completely falls under pretty much any computer sabotage act out
there -ever-.<br>
<br>
but... ofcourse... to you... some not-even-illegal use of 'smtp' or
some wintendo virusses that could be out there, are of higher
priority than keeping the internet working, and not breaking any
laws yourself.<br>
<br>
keep in mind, we, the owners of the internet, isps and carriers, and
yes we do OWN it, 'tolerate' blacklists... as long as they don't go
around making silly demands, such as 'contacting' them, or gaining
too much influence and starting to 'demand' to disconnect things
without even bothering to get a court order.<br>
<br>
what's next... the RIAA setting up one as well?<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 31 ينا, 2017 ص 04:17, ox wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:201701310419.v0V4JQ6d023997@mxdrop305.xs4all.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:21:54 +0000
HRH Prince Sven Olaf von CyberBunker <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:svenk@xs4all.nl"><svenk@xs4all.nl></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">smtp is just one of many protocols out there, a primitive, fairly
unimportant and severely lacking in terms of security one at that,
and it's protection cannot be a reason for any disconnection -ever-.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">This thread is about DNSBL and not about the smtp protocol but the
replies helped us all understand why it is important to permanently list
entire IP ranges. (Even if the resources change hands)
Personally, I think that block times should be increased or become more
permanent.
Practically and right now, some of the block lists that I feed data
into is talking about discontinuing 24 hour blocks completely and
moving to much longer block times.
Other lists are considering completely discontinuing auto de-listing.
The effect of this will mean that abuse@ will have to become more responsive
in order to avoid being more permanently listed.
Andre
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>