<div dir="ltr">I remember someone having this issue last year and as far i remember he was not able to get ripe to unblock him so i think you are out of luck. </div><div class="gmail_extra"> <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette <<a href="mailto:rfg@tristatelogic.com" target="_blank">rfg@tristatelogic.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> In message <<a href="mailto:20141117224139.GA91687@cilantro.c4inet.net">20141117224139.GA91687@cilantro.c4inet.net</a>>, "Sascha Luck [ml]" <<a href="mailto:aawg@c4inet.net">aawg@c4inet.net</a>> wrote: >On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:55:10PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>% Queries from your IP address have passed the daily limit of controlled obje >cts. >>% Access from your host has been temporarily denied. >>% For more information, see >>% >><a href="http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-db/why-did-you-receive-the-error-20" target="_blank">http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-db/why-did-you-receive-the-error-20</a> >1-access-denied > >This is a limit on "person:" objects, NCC's idea of data >protection. Apparently. >Don't think you'd like my solution for this though, I wouldn't >allow anyone who isn't a) identifiable and b) contracted access >to personally identifying data. I would be perfectly OK with (a). In fact, accessing this service only via individual password-protected accounts seems to me to be the only rational way to _actually_ protect the data from mass harvesting. Regarding (b) I would be OK with that too, as long as the contract in question required me to pay only zero dollars... er... I mean zero euros. Regards, rfg </blockquote></div> </div>