<div>isnt it a good test case for having IRT object in RIPE db as well. </div><div> Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui </div><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Shane Kerr <<a href="mailto:shane@time-travellers.org">shane@time-travellers.org</a>> wrote: <blockquote style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;" class="gmail_quote"> All, On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 19:45 +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > Actually, it is. The string to enter in the web interface, in the input box is: > > -BL 212.86.64.0 - <a href="tel:212.86.79.255" value="+12128679255">212.86.79.255</a> > > or alternatively, you should be able to select the -L or -l from the > "Advanced Search Form" interface. > > But it looks like over there it is not offered on a simple point-n-click basis ;-) > Nevertheless, each individual flag option can be requested explicitely in the > input field of the web-inerface. I tried the "Abuse Finder" tool for this and it didn't seem to help: <a href="http://lab.db.ripe.net/portal/abuse-finder.htm" target="_blank">http://lab.db.ripe.net/portal/abuse-finder.htm</a> The heuristics are described here: <a href="http://labs.ripe.net/Members/Paul_P_/content-updated-heuristics-abuse-finder-service" target="_blank">http://labs.ripe.net/Members/Paul_P_/content-updated-heuristics-abuse-finder-service</a> Maybe it makes sense to have some fallback to non-abuse-specific contacts (admin-c/tech-c) if no abuse contacts have been defined? Perhaps with a warning that no actual abuse contacts have been registered.... -- Shane </blockquote></div>