This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Is the LoA DoA for Routing? - article at FIRST blog
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Is the LoA DoA for Routing? - article at FIRST blog
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at protonmail.com
Fri Jan 19 17:31:40 CET 2024
Greetings, One can always go to the local authorities, then jurisdiction and how the local justice/court system works comes into play. The RIRs have an authoritative view about who owns what, and they share it with everyone, so to me that's the simplest way. Regards, Carlos On Friday, 19 January 2024 at 15:06, Tomás Leite de Castro via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Hello Carlos, > > > Even if who signs it can't hold what they claim with the RIRs' trust anchors > > > If you believe this is true, then you can forward a claim to the local authorities as signing a Fake LOA is a criminal offense which could end in imprisonment. > > Best Regards, > > > Tomás >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Is the LoA DoA for Routing? - article at FIRST blog
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]