This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] LEA Transparency Report 2023
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LEA Transparency Report 2023
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LEA Transparency Report 2023
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex de Joode
adejoode at idgara.nl
Wed Apr 10 21:02:24 CEST 2024
The EU is working on implementing the e-Evidence directive. This means any-and-all EU based LEO's can request data from RIPE NCC and RIPE NCC needs to supply the data if it has the data available. No 'let us check' no 'you can have this via our website' answers possible anymore. This will most likely be extended for signatories of the 'Budapest convention', the US is very eager to have access to this data also. (There is the public data, but to know who pays for a resource is of course easier to check as the banks know a lot more about their clients than RIPE). https://commission.europa.eu/law/cross-border-cases/judicial-cooperation/types-judicial-cooperation/e-evidence-cross-border-access-electronic-evidence_en-- IDGARA | Alex de Joode | alex at idgara.nl | +31651108221 On Wed, 10-04-2024 19h 28min, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > Hi Randy > > Agreed and I'm not saying we should just hand everything over on a gold plate to LE. Bien we cannot just say no all the time, but should actually come up with solutions we feel are good or a good compromise. > > I expect LE to understand our issues, but we should understand theirs > > Best > Serge > > On 10 April 2024 16:25:26 UTC, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > In a recent talk Jane Easterly said: "The private sector has promised > better security for yeas but has not delivered. This has to change". > was this not in the context of software and platform safety? easterly has been riding that hobby horse for a few years, and with serious justification. but i agree that the RIRs could be clearer in what they can and can not do for LE. and there needs to be a balance of visibility and privacy. LE is always gonna want more; that's their job, and we need them. but, as jeff schiller said (in the ietf protocol design context) "Law enforcement was not supposed to be easy. Where it is easy, it's called a police state." randy -- Dr. Serge Droz Director, Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams https://first.org -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20240410/20ed68b2/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LEA Transparency Report 2023
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] LEA Transparency Report 2023
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]