This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Levine
johnl at taugh.com
Sun Apr 7 19:44:45 CEST 2024
It appears that Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> said: >On Sat 06/Apr/2024 19:54:27 +0200 Randy Bush wrote: >>>>> Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number >>>>> assignment? >>>> Because your ISP can't be bothered. >>> Is such unbotherability legitimate? >RIPE could at least reproach those LIRs that have an inet6num but no rDNS >delegation to it. RIPE does what its members want it to do. If they don't care about rDNS, so be it. If you care about rDNS, you need to find a better ISP that meets your needs. Then tell the old one why you left. R's, John
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]