This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Sat Apr 6 11:52:45 CEST 2024
On Fri 05/Apr/2024 20:19:59 +0200 John Levine wrote: > It appears that Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> said: >>Why isn't it possible to gain a delegation by proving number assignment? > > Because your ISP can't be bothered. Is such unbotherability legitimate? I appreciate the fact that my provider endowed me with a bunch of IPv6 addresses. Previous ISPs couldn't put up with it. However, to have addresses and not being able to use them is not much of an advancement. Best Ale --
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Reverse DNS delegations
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]