This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo at vegoda.org
Thu Nov 30 13:38:59 CET 2023
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 at 13:16, Alessandro Vesely <vesely at tana.it> wrote: > > On Thu 30/Nov/2023 12:40:46 +0100 Laura Atkins wrote: > > What happens if / when someone doesn’t? > > A minimal, yet useful reaction would be to remove their abuse PoC from RDAP > pages. If the convention is clear that network operators without abuse-c are > non-responders, it is easy for all the others to add the corresponding IPs to > their drop lists. Ripe NCC could even distribute non-responders lists. > > A motion to reclaim wasted resources can be set up at a later time. Publishing factual data that others can use to inform their own decision making processes seems quite different from reclaiming resources. A more productive path to evaluate. Thanks, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]