[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

Hi Leo,

I don’t see it as a regulator, I see it as one of the functions of a RIR. Not just provide numbers, but also ensure that they are being used fairly and according community agreed policies. Otherwise we could also say that other reasons for recovery are invalid because we become a regulator, right?

Each RIR has measured the “level of adoption” as they progressed with the initial verification (and this was presented at least a couple of times in every RIR), so there are slides in each of them, showing the progress. I can try to find them for you in the previous year's events if you can’t find them. Also my personal experience reporting over 1.500 abuse cases, average per day, shows that I get more “happy-ending” responses from those regions than before and keeps going better and better, which is not the case from RIPE unfortunately.

Regards,
Jordi

@jordipalet


> El 29 nov 2023, a las 16:09, Leo Vegoda <leo at vegoda.org> escribió:
> 
> Hi Jordi,
> 
> 
> On Nov 29, 2023, at 11:29, jordi.palet--- via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote:
>> 
>> I agree that the carrot is better than the stick, but if the carrot doesn’t work, we need to use the stick.
>> 
>> My original proposal was basically enforcing the NCC to reclaim the resources when there is a persistent violation of resolving abuse cases. This can be progressive, such as not allowing to update objects in the database, etc. No need to go with “a single failure means you lose your resources”.
> 
> How could we do this without the RIPE NCC becoming some kind of regulator? Or is the proposal to make the RIPE NCC a private sector regulator?
> 
>> As said, this is working in other 2 regions, one more coming (pending of the AFRINIC board ratification). Why should not work in this region the same? Also the PoC in ARIN works in a similar way, and being non-responsive means you get some “members” rights restricted.
> 
> Who has been measuring the reduction is abuse? How tightly is that drop in abuse linked to this policy action rather than other factors?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Leo
> 


**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.