This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Thu Nov 2 09:21:01 CET 2023
Leo, On 01/11/2023 22.37, Leo Vegoda wrote: > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 14:26, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 01:45:03PM -0700, Leo Vegoda wrote: >>> The RIPE NCC periodically asks the community about the priority for >>> cleaning up unused ASNs, e.g. >>> >>> - https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/active-wg/db/minutes/ripe-52 >>> (item G), and >>> - https://ripe82.ripe.net/presentations/7-RIPE82-Feeback-from-RS.pdf (slide 16) >>> >>> So far, the answer has been that it is a low priority. Perhaps because >>> there are about 4 billion left. >> >> Low priority or not, the NCC is spending quite a bit of hostmaster time >> in talking to LIRs and trying to reclaim "looks unused" ASNs. Guess how >> I know. >> >> "Here's my 50 bucks, I claim I need this for another year" is so much >> less lifetime wasted on all sides. > > Sure, but that's a membership decision and not a community decision. My understanding of how this all works would be that if the anti-abuse community felt strongly that a fee for ASN would reduce abuse on the Internet, that it could put together a proposal saying just that. While this would ultimately have to be up to the members to approve (*), at least they would have a clear proposal with documented rational to discuss. (*) I guess? I admit to never having read the details of how charging is set, since I have never represented a RIPE NCC member. Cheers, -- Shane -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0x3732979CF967B306.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 11519 bytes Desc: OpenPGP public key URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231102/22493c4f/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231102/22493c4f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]