[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

Hi,

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 09:40:22AM +0000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
> The claim is that the change in policy had an impact in other regions.
> If that is true then where is the data to backup that assertion?

Especially: saying "it feels less painful to send abuse complaints", aka
"there is less bounces" is not the same as "there is less abuse" or "more 
people properly handle abuse requests directed to them now"

"Getting a bounce from an ill-maintained abuse mailbox" might actually
be more insightful than "the mail is delivered just fine, but then ignored"
- nothing in these proposals will force the receiver to deal with the mail
properly, so getting abounce actually sends a clear signal "please just
block this target network" instead of raising hopes.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/anti-abuse-wg/attachments/20231205/1ba4412f/attachment.sig>