This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo at vegoda.org
Sun Dec 3 15:00:33 CET 2023
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 02:56, Serge Droz via anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > > Maybe it's time to measure these numbers in the RIPE region by trying a time limit experiment. > > If it doesn't work, we stop it again. We would have to discuss criteria for what "it work" means. That's a discussion I'd like to see on this list. > > By never trying anything concrete it's easy saying it doesn't work. We already have two experiments in APNIC and LACNIC. Have those experiments resulted in a reduction in abuse tied to resources managed by those RIRs? Kind regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]