[anti-abuse-wg] Abuse Report ignored. What to do as next?

It will make some organizations start handling reports that didn't do it 
before.

We tried this in Switzerland, sending all ISPs abuse data asking them to 
deal with it. In the beginning, very little enthusiasm, today most do.

None of these proposals have ever been tries, yet your you insist on 
knowing they don't work. Let's try it and see what happens. If you 
insist on 100% guarantees you'll never change anything. This is, why in 
the IETF you can't simply say no, but you have to come with an 
alternative. So to that I challenge you.

With this attitude the internet wouldn't exist. Sounds like the "Seat 
belts don't work" fraction back in the day.

But I'll shut up now and focus on more constructive discussions elsewhere.

Best
Serge


On 01.12.23 13:22, Laura Atkins wrote:
> None of this will make a company who doesn’t want to deal with abuse 
> complaints deal with abuse complaints. It’s a total waste of resources.
> 
> laura
> 
>> On 1 Dec 2023, at 10:53, U.Mutlu <security at mutluit.com> wrote:
>>
>> For each complaint to RIPE NCC then such an
>> (automated) email should be sent by the RIPE NCC
>> to the abuse-c of that member.
>> This should be the absolute minimum that should be done by the RIPE NCC.
>>
>>
>> Matthias Merkel wrote on 11/30/23 11:47:
>>> The proposal is to send verification emails to abuse mailboxes and 
>>> have a link
>>> in them clicked, right? I would have no objection to that.
>>>
>>> Is there more that is being proposed in this proposal specifically?
>>>
>>> —
>>> Maria Merkel
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or 
>> change your subscription options, please visit: 
>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> 
> -- 
> The Delivery Expert
> 
> Laura Atkins
> Word to the Wise
> laura at wordtothewise.com
> 
> Delivery hints and commentary: http://wordtothewise.com/blog
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Dr. Serge Droz
Member, FIRST Board of Directors
https://www.first.org