This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Cost-benefit of registering reassignments
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Cost-benefit of registering reassignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alessandro Vesely
vesely at tana.it
Wed Apr 19 18:01:22 CEST 2023
On Wed 19/Apr/2023 15:39:48 +0200 Michele Neylon - Blacknight via anti-abuse-wg wrote: > How big an IP allocation do you have? /29, which I think is the minimum size. > As an LIR we routinely assign blocks of IPs to clients with more than X IPs or > blocks etc., and give them their own abuse-c etc., What's X? And doesn't that depend on the kind of link (PON, DSL, P2P)? > But we wouldn’t do it for a single IP. > > Though tbh it sounds more like an issue with the block list than anything to do > with the IP address, your ISP or anyone else. MIPSpace.com. They're ID 595 in Valli's multirbl list, but they're not tested when you run the lookup. Best Ale --
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Cost-benefit of registering reassignments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]