This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Mon Jun 20 12:48:22 CEST 2022
Hi, The RIPE NCC Service Region spans over 70+ economies. In fact it spans over the whole planet when someone from outside the service region details some plans to use IP addresses mostly within the service region -- is this verified some time after the resources are allocated? So perhaps the first hurdle to change anything is understanding that RIPE/RIPE NCC <> EU, despite the fact the RIPE NCC must abide by the laws of ONE of EU's member countries. Regards, Carlos On Sun, 19 Jun 2022, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > Just a brief point. I previously noted here that RIPE's rules requiring > unanimity or near unanimity in order to declare "consensus" with respect > to any given proposal has recently been recognized, by some EU politicians > at least, as being a material impediment to forward movement on various > issues. > > I only just noted that this growing sentiment has now apparently extended > even to the Chancellor of Germany: > > https://twitter.com/EuromaidanPress/status/1538637496124317704 > > My hope, of course, is that RIPE and its various WGs are taking notes. > > > Regards, > rfg > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/ >
- Previous message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
- Next message (by thread): [anti-abuse-wg] Unanimity
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]